Enhancing Student Engagement with Feedback at the Programme Level Using Digital Tools
Academic lead in the Department of Biosciences: Dr Mathilde Roger Leads from DCAD: Julie Mulvey & Sumetha Karthigeyen About the…
Academic lead in the Department of Biosciences: Dr Mathilde Roger Leads from DCAD: Julie Mulvey & Sumetha Karthigeyen About the…
Academic lead in the School of Modern Languages & Culture: Dr Aziza Zaher Lead from DCAD: James Youdale About the…
Who? Dr Michaela Oliver, Assistant Professor in the School of Education What? First-year undergraduate module of over 140 students, comprised…
In 2024, the Durham Learning & Teaching Conference theme was ‘Assessment for learning’. Our keynote speaker and colleagues from across…
Self feedback is a guided process in which students evaluate their own work according to marking criteria. It is often…
Who are marking criteria for? Marking criteria and standards aim to make the assessment process more transparent for everyone. For…
Marking criteria calibration involves an iterative process where staff work with samples of student work in order to either create…
This advice is based on the Guidance and Support for Marking Criteria Review (internal to Durham University) that was approved…
Giving good, impactful feedback to large classes can be difficult. One possible solution is the delivery of audio and visual feedback…
Peer feedback is a guided process through which students provide each other with constructive comments on works-in-progress, drafts or finalised…
Marking, feedback and feedforward are key aspects of learning and teaching. Through assignments, students can apply the knowledge and skills…
This is a short guide to developing effective formative assessment. Formative assessment refers to assessment that is specifically intended to generate feedback…